A Modal Logic for Subjective Default Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we introduce DML: Default Modal Logic. DML is a logic endowed with a two-place modal connective that has the intended meaning of \If , then normally ". On top of providing a well-de ned tool for analyzing common default reasoning, DML allows nesting of the default operator. We present a semantic framework in which many of the known default proof systems can be naturally characterized, and prove soundness and completeness theorems for several such proof systems. Our semantics is a \neighbourhood modal semantics", and it allows for subjective defaults, that is, defaults may vary among di erent worlds within the same model. The semantics has an appealing intuitive interpretation and may be viewed as a set-theoretic generalization of the probabilistic interpretations of default reasoning. We show that our semantics is most general in the sense that any modal semantics that is sound for some basic axioms for default reasoning is a special case of our semantics. Such a generality result may serve to provide a semantical analysis of the relative strength of different proof systems and to show the nonexistence of semantics with certain properties. 2
منابع مشابه
Deontic Modals: Why Abandon the Default Approach
John Horty has proposed an approach to reasoning with oughtpropositions which stands in contrast to the standard modal approach to deontic logic. Horty’s approach is based on default theories as known from the framework of Default Logic. It is argued that the approach cannot be extended beyond the most simple kinds of default theories and that it fails in particular to account for conditional o...
متن کاملMore on modal aspects of default logic
Investigations of default logic have been so far mostly concerned with the notion of an extension of a default theory. It turns out, however, that default logic is much richer. Namely, there are other natural classes of objects that might be associated with default reasoning. We study two such classes of objects with emphasis on their relations with modal nonmonotonic formalisms. First, we intr...
متن کاملNonmonotonie Default Modal Logics (detailed Abstract)
Conclusions by failure to prove the opposite are frequently used in reasoning about an incompletely specified world. This naturally leads to logics for default reasoning which, in general, are nonmonotonic, i.e., inlzoducing new facts can invalidate previously made conclusions. Accordingly, a nonmonotonic theory is called (nonmonotonically) degenerate, if adding new axioms does not invalidate a...
متن کاملA Practical Theory of Nonmonotonic Temporal Modelling
This paper sets out a framework for modelling causal or predictive systems, and is concerned with bridging the gap between the theory and practice of nonmonotonic temporal reasoning. The central result is a nonmonotonic reasoning methodology which subsumes Shoham's chronological ignorance (CI) formalism for causal theories. The new formalism uses an extension of Re-iter's default logic and, unl...
متن کاملNonmonotonic Reasoning via Possibility Theory
I I I I We introduce the operation of possibility qualification and show how I this modal-like operator can be used to represent "typical" or default knowledge in a theory of nonmonotonic reasoning. We investigate the representational power of this ·approach I by· looking at a number of prototypical problems from the nonmonotoni� reasoning literature. particular we look at the so called Yale sh...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1994